facebook-pixel
Field ops on autopilot →AI Dispatcher → 1:1 demo

Weekly Team Performance

Weekly Team Performance is an AI agent in FieldCamp that runs every Monday at 9 AM and analyzes each technician's past week — visits completed, job duration patterns, revenue produced, and on-time arrivals — ranking the team and surfacing who's excelling, who's slipping, and what the numbers suggest asking about.

Runs Mondays 9 AMAnalyzes per-tech metricsRanks the team

A real template from the FieldCamp marketplace, configured on your operation. Setup included in your plan.

About this agent

Where it came from

Ships in the FieldCamp agent marketplace — because team performance is managed by anecdote in most shops, and anecdotes are unfair in both directions.

Without numbers, team management runs on impressions: the tech who complains less seems better, the one on brutal routes seems slower, and the quiet drift of a good tech having a bad month gets noticed a quarter late. Impressions are unfair to exactly the people data would vindicate.

This agent runs the numbers weekly: visits, durations against job-type norms, revenue, on-time rate — per tech, ranked, with context so route luck doesn't masquerade as merit. Excellence gets visible (and praisable), slips get caught at week two instead of month three, and the Monday huddle gets facts where the vibes used to be.

What it actually does

Trigger: Weekly — Monday 9 AM

  1. 1

    Runs Monday at 9schedule_monday

    After the week closes, in time for the Monday huddle.

  2. 2

    Computes each tech's weekcompute_tech_metrics

    Visits, durations versus job-type norms, revenue, on-time arrivals.

  3. 3

    Ranks fairlyrank_with_context

    Route difficulty and job mix weighted in — raw counts flatter the lucky.

  4. 4

    Flags the driftsflag_changes

    Who's trending up, who's slipping versus their own baseline — worth praise or a question.

What you get

A Monday team scoreboard that's fair, contextual, and two months earlier than the conversation you'd otherwise have.

A run, as you’d see it

Agent runs land on a timeline — what fired, what the agent found, and the action waiting for a human. This is that screen.

Team report ready

Mon 9:00 AM · 6 techs analyzed

Pending

Details

Flag

Marcus on-time rate −15%

Summary

Priya leads on revenue per visit (3rd week running — her upsell scripts work). Marcus's on-time rate dropped 15% vs his baseline; his routes added two far-north stops — likely routing, not effort. Suggest: rebalance north territory.

DismissOpen report

Reports to managers, unattended. It never messages technicians directly — performance conversations are yours.

By trade

Same agent, configured to how your vertical actually works.

HVAC

Install versus service tracks separate baselines — comparing them flatters nobody.

Cleaning

Crew-level metrics where work is teamed — individual stats would be fiction.

Questions, answered

Do my techs see this?

By default it goes to managers only. Some shops share a version in the Monday huddle — visibility done openly tends to lift the middle. Your call, configured during setup.

How does it avoid punishing techs with hard routes?

Durations compare against job-type norms and the ranking weighs route difficulty and job mix. The example flag in this very template is one that exonerates the tech and blames the routing.

Is revenue per tech a fair metric?

Alone, no — paired with job mix and visit counts, it's informative. The report presents the cluster, not one number, precisely so it informs conversations instead of replacing them.

Have an agent idea we haven’t built?

The ideas section of this library exists because customers keep asking "could it just…?" Bring yours. If it should exist, we build it — and it ships as a template like this one.

No demo deck. Just your business and ours.